Publication
Mar 2008
This paper examines ways to combine qualitative and quantitative models to predict political instability and mass violence. The author explains that the advent of quantitative forecasting models has led to calls for these models to replace traditional qualitative analysis. He argues, however, that policymakers and analysts should insist on a multiple-method approach, which has greater forecasting power than either the quantitative or qualitative method alone.
Download |
English (PDF, 16 pages, 364 KB) |
---|---|
Author | Jack A Goldstone |
Series | USIP Special Reports |
Issue | 204 |
Publisher | United States Institute of Peace (USIP) |
Copyright | © 2008 United States Institute of Peace (USIP) |