International Law and the Nature of Security

23 Jan 2012

In this Symposium on International Law and the Quest for Security, Professor Richard Falk discusses the origins of the modern state and the issue of sustaining internal order and security amid an international environment in which terrorists groups that are not territorial can inflict severe damage within sovereign states.

[Resource Embedded:136199]

Related Reading

UNU logo

Legality and Legitimacy in International Order
This brief explores the disconnect between legality and legitimacy in international relations, commenting on the NATO intervention in Kosovo in 1999 and the 2003 US invasion of Iraq. The authors argue that the gap between legality and legitimacy is rooted in the disconnect between the needs of real-world situations and the codified international rules that aim to govern these situations.

Beyond Closing Guantanamo: Next Steps to Rebuild a Transatlantic Partnership in International Law
This paper discusses how the Obama Administration has raised its scrutiny of the US’s role in the international legal system. After providing an overview of international humanitarian law and its relationship to international criminal justice, the authors then discuss how the US can strengthen its legal diplomacy in order to play a more prominent role in the creation and enforcement of international law.

Foreign Policy Centre (FPC) Logo

A New Grand Bargain for Peace: Towards a Reformation in International Security Law
This publication argues that bridging the gulf between US and European perceptions and "non-Western" perceptions of the international legal and political order must receive top priority in the UN. Issues such as the use of sanctions, military intervention and the regulation of weapons of mass destruction are also discussed.

external pageDelegitimizing or Evolving? The Legality of UN Security Council Resolutions Imposing Duties on Non-State Actors

This paper examines the disputed legality of UN Security Council (UNSC) resolutions dealing with non-state actors.

Intervention to Stop Genocide and Mass Atrocities: International Norms and US Policy

This report tackles the question of whether the international laws presently governing the resort to armed intervention are both appropriate and effective in deterring and stopping mass atrocities. The author concludes that the regime could be effective if it was more systematically applied. The report emphasizes 1) how political will and capabilities are not independent of international law but are shaped by it, and 2) how the normative ‘terrain’ of intervention can affect operations on the ground.