How Globalization Affects Transnational Crime

9 Jul 2012

Globalization not only facilitates international trade but also transnational crime. Phil Williams talks about the myriad transnational criminal networks operating in a globalized world.

One of the key themes we will cover in this week's Security Watch entries is the impact transnational crime and narcotics are having on North American security dynamics. In order to look at this topic more closely, today we present a video from our partners at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in which Phil Williams discusses the explosion of transnational crime in a globalized world.

[Resource Embedded:145703]

"Transnational criminals have been one of the biggest beneficiaries of globalization." Globalization facilitates international trade but also increases the difficulty of regulating global trade; traffickers and smugglers have exploited this. Williams adds that globalization has increased inequality around the globe, and that "its disruptive effect has actually caused people to have to go into organized crime and operate in illicit markets as coping mechanisms."
The global financial system has undergone widespread deregulation since the 1970s. This has allowed illicit actors to launder the proceeds of crime more easily. "We've got some reregulation to try to deal with money laundering…but it's not particularly effective," says Williams.

Terrorists, insurgents, and warlords all rely on illegal activities as a funding mechanism, says Williams. "Sometimes, when they engage in a criminal activity, they come into contact with criminal organizations, but for the most part, the direct group-to-group link is not that important. It's just a market activity or a supplier relationship," he notes, disputing the idea of a "crime-terror nexus."

"There's no single model of a criminal organization." The conventional wisdom that criminal networks have abandoned their hierarchical structure, Williams says, obscures the fact that criminals adopt myriad distinct structures depending on their circumstances—and some of them remain hierarchical.

Illicit networks are challenging to states, because states are military and diplomatically organized to deal with other states. Governments around the world "have found it very hard to adapt to nonstate or sovereignty-free actors."

This video is part of a post on the CFR blog, external pageThe Internationalist, a series dedicated to in-depth discussions about leveraging multilateral cooperation to meet today's transnational challenges.


For additional reading on this topic please see:
International Terrorism and Transnational Crime
Collaboration Under Anarchy
Possibilities of Cooperation in the Central Asian Region Between Major Regional and Global Actors

JavaScript has been disabled in your browser