Publication
2004
The dominant (though contested) wisdom among international relations scholars is that military officers tend to be more cautious than their civilian counterparts about initiating the use of force. Sobered by the experience of combat, the theory holds, soldiers are hesitant to recommend military action except under the most favorable of circumstances. It might be the case, however, that military conservatism is simply a product of strong civilian oversight. Indeed, scholars have suggested that military officers actually have powerful incentives to promote the use of force, but these predilections may be muted when civilian leaders can punish officers for botched military adventures.
Download |
English (PDF, 29 pages, 165 KB) |
---|---|
Author | Todd S Sechser |
Series | CISAC Journal |
Publisher | Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC) |
Copyright | © 2004 Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC) |