Publication

Feb 2012

The effectiveness of NATO conditionality for institutional reforms is highly controversial. Some papers argue that any effect this conditionality might have had may be due to endogeneity effects, ie NATO may have picked the winners. The authors of this paper argue that this is not the case. First, NATO-Macedonia relations provide a case in point. Macedonia was granted entry into the Membership Action Plan (MAP) in 1999 due to country’s strategic importance. Only after the Ohrid agreement, effective conditionality set in and marked a switch in NATO strategy from security only towards institution building. Second, an event study reveals that entry into NATO’s accession process was mainly driven by neighbourhood and good relations with the West.

Download English (PDF, 23 pages, 239 KB)
Author Rainer Schweickert, Inna Melnykovska, Hanno Heitmann
Series Kiel Institute Working Papers
Issue 1757
Publisher Kiel Institute for the World Economy
Copyright © 2012 Kiel Institute for the World Economy
JavaScript has been disabled in your browser