Publication

1 Oct 2013

In this interview, Daniel Levine argues that international relations (IR) studies need to be more vocationally oriented and less omniscient in its theory building and analyses. The latter Weberian 'view of (sic) nowhere' just doesn't cut it – IR studies need to bridge the gap between concepts and things if they hope to pass future 'so what?' tests.

Download English (PDF, 13 pages, 316 KB)
Author Daniel Levine
Series Theory Talks
Issue 58
Publisher Theory Talks
Copyright Theory Talks by Peer Schouten is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
JavaScript has been disabled in your browser