Publication

This report outlines the dilemma of releasing suspected terrorists to their home countries where they may face torture. The author explains the use of assurances against torture by the US to prevent countries from mistreating transferred persons. She discusses the criticism of this diplomatic practice and the lack of alternatives. The report concludes that in spite of reliability problems, assurances against torture are the most appropriate tool to handle the release of suspects. The author advocates addressing the criticism and cooperating with Canada and European states to improve the practice and develop effective alternatives.