Publication

24 Jul 2006

The author of this paper argues that a rush to decide on a replacement of the Trident missile system in the UK is unnecessary, reduces military flexibility and interoperability with the US, undermines the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and stymies an open debate. According to the author there are technical reasons for believing the life expectancy of the existing submarines could be greater than estimated, and that the replacement costs could be reduced by avoiding a full replacement program.

Download English (PDF, 4 pages, 68 KB)
Author Paul Ingram
Series BASIC Publications
Publisher British American Security Information Council (BASIC)
Copyright © 2006 British American Security Information Council (BASIC)
JavaScript has been disabled in your browser