Publication
Sep 2013
This paper explores why results-based approaches to foreign aid may be less vulnerable to corruption than traditional approaches. The paper first characterizes the key differences between traditional input-tracking programs and results-based approaches and considers the conditions under which one approach or another might be more appropriate. It concludes that input-tracking approaches are more vulnerable to corruption than results-based approaches because they have high failure costs and a weak track record for controlling diverted funds.
Download |
English (PDF, 30 pages, 675 KB) |
---|---|
Author | Charles Kenny, William Savedoff |
Series | CGD Working Papers |
Issue | 345 |
Publisher | Center for Global Development (CGD) |
Copyright | © 2013 Center for Global Development (CGD) |