Public and Elite Opinion on Nuclear Politics
2021 – 2024
The past few years have seen an increase in both nuclear crises and advocacy efforts aimed at influencing nuclear policy. Each has again raised enduring questions about public opinion on nuclear issues and the compatibility of military and civilian nuclear technologies with democratic governance. Consequently, much recent scholarship has emerged on these topics, which has also been subject to extensive criticism.
This project seeks to substantively and methodologically build and improve upon nascent literature on public and elite nuclear attitudes. It investigates a range of important themes related to the domestic dimensions of nuclear politics. Questions addressed by this project include: Do publics really support the use of nuclear weapons? How do public and elite opinion intersect in the domains of nuclear conflict, arms control, and weapons proliferation? Are “standard operating procedures” related to controlling risks from military and civilian nuclear technologies in need of reassessment?
The mode of inquiry for this research is mixed methods, drawing on qualitative, experimental, and quasi-experimental approaches. In doing so, the project endeavors to achieve academic rigor and policy relevance through study design choices and external validity. For example, survey experimental efforts may be based on background archival research or policymaker focus groups.
Selected Publications
Herzog, Stephen (2022) 'The Nuclear Reality is Unsettling', ETH Zukunftsblog. November 21.
external page Herzog, Stephen (2022) 'Beyond Nuclear Deterrence', Science 378, 6616: 115.
Related Publications